Subversion entsorgt? Lizenz-Verstoß! "Another less obvious issue I recently noticed is that OpenSSL contains code that is licensed under the Apache License (which requires that the license is distributed as well). The Apache license isn't included in the OpenSSL source directory and the commit message didn't mention it (or whether approval was requested and given). For details see: /usr/src/crypto/openssl/crypto/ec There are Apache license texts in a couple of contrib directories that are required for Subversion, but if you remove unused parts of the sources before you distribute them you may end up unintentionally violating the Apache license for the code that's part of OpenSSL. This is also the reason why I asked for the list of BSDL deviations and what they cover. I was aware that the Subversion bits are licensed under the Apache license but only recently became aware that parts of OpenSSL are licensed under the Apache license as well and were added without the license text." Quelle: Private Mail